Recapd

Iran expands tiered internet access amid online blackout

· news

Iran Expands Tiered Internet Access Amid Continued Online Blackout

Iran has expanded its tiered internet access model, allowing select individuals and entities to connect while keeping the majority offline. This policy, shrouded in claims of national security concerns, has left many experts puzzled about the country’s digital future.

On the surface, President Masoud Pezeshkian’s creation of a Specialised Headquarters for Organising and Guiding Iran’s Cyberspace appears to be an attempt to streamline internet governance. However, this move is merely a stopgap measure for a deeper issue – the government’s continued restriction of online access.

The Supreme Council of Cyberspace, established in 2012 by the late Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, has been driving Iran’s heavy-handed approach to internet regulation. With its current secretary, Mohammad Amin Aghamiri, at the helm, the council has restricted Iranians’ access to the global web based on “security considerations.” These concerns have little to do with actual security threats and much to do with maintaining control over the flow of information.

The 12-week near-total online blackout is a stark example of this control. Those who can afford it must rely on expensive virtual private networks (VPNs) or state-distributed services like “Internet Pro.” This tiered system creates a digital divide, where those with means get preferential access while the rest are left in the dark.

Chief Justice Gholam-Hossein Mohseni-Ejei recently acknowledged that Internet Pro’s implementation has been inconsistent and that it has become a tool of public opinion manipulation. His warning that any infractions of internet laws must be prosecuted reinforces the government’s heavy hand.

Iran’s tiered internet access model raises important questions about the role of technology in modern governance. Is this policy truly about national security, or is it an excuse for maintaining control over its citizens? The answer lies in the country’s history of using online restrictions to quell dissent and maintain power.

The November 2019 nationwide protests saw a near-total internet shutdown lasting around a week. The government responded by imposing heavy restrictions on online access while allowing select individuals and entities to connect. This approach has been dubbed “smart censorship” by some experts, who argue that the government uses technology to selectively restrict or allow information flow.

Amidst this backdrop, digital security expert Amir Rashidi believes that tiered internet access is here to stay in Iran. He points out that it is rooted in longstanding policies approved by the Supreme Council of Cyberspace after the 2019 protests. With Pezeshkian’s new cyberspace headquarters, Rashidi fears that little hope remains for fundamental changes to government policy.

Iran’s continued reliance on internet shutdowns has far-reaching social and economic implications. The country’s scientific and research communications have been severely disrupted, with minister of science, research and technology Hossein Simaei Saraf warning that the continuation of the disruption will be “against national security.”

Ultimately, Iran’s tiered internet access model is less about national security and more about maintaining control over its citizens. The government’s actions are a stark reminder that in this digital age, the lines between freedom and oppression can quickly blur. As the situation continues to unfold, one thing is clear – Iran’s online future hangs precariously in the balance.

Reader Views

  • EK
    Editor K. Wells · editor

    The tiered internet access model in Iran is a cleverly designed mechanism for social control. By restricting online access and requiring citizens to purchase expensive VPNs or rely on state-distributed services like Internet Pro, the government can monitor and manipulate public opinion with ease. However, this system also creates a lucrative black market for underground internet services, which are often unregulated and potentially insecure. The real question is: how long will it take for Iran's citizens to find ways to circumvent these restrictions, and what will be the consequences of their actions?

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    This tiered internet access model is a classic example of Iran's creative problem-solving in censorship. By offering select groups preferential access, the government creates a new layer of social and economic stratification. Those who can afford the VPNs or state-approved services will have an advantage over those who don't, further widening the digital divide. But what's more concerning is that this system is unlikely to stem the tide of online dissent – it merely channels it into managed spaces where the regime can monitor and control.

  • RJ
    Reporter J. Avery · staff reporter

    The expanded tiered internet access in Iran is a cleverly crafted solution to a problem of the government's own making. By selectively allowing access to a privileged few, they're masking the true extent of their censorship regime. What's concerning is that this system not only creates an unfair digital divide but also enables the government to monitor and control online activity with ease. The inconsistent rollout of Internet Pro services is just the tip of the iceberg – it's clear that Iran's authorities are more interested in maintaining a stranglehold on information than promoting genuine public engagement.

Related